“British Airways has admitted liability for the accident, but is resisting the sum Mr Chesterton is claiming, saying it is not liable for compensation for any alleged psychological damage,” stated Jessica Muurman, representing Andrew Chesterton in his ongoing lawsuit against the airline.
Chesterton is seeking more than £50,000 after suffering a severe finger injury during a flight from Heathrow to Cincinnati in April 2023. The incident occurred when he put his hand between the seats and caught two fingers on a sharp object, resulting in immediate pain and bleeding.
Seated in 1A, Chesterton required four stitches in his ring finger and seven stitches in his little finger upon landing. The injury has left him with a 15mm scar on his left ring finger and an 18mm scar on his left little finger.
“The claimant has been left with a 15mm scar on his left ring finger, and an 18mm scar on his left little finger,” Muurman added, detailing the physical repercussions of the incident.
In addition to the physical injuries, Chesterton claims to have experienced reduced grip strength, stiffness, and hypersensitivity in his left little finger. He also reported psychological effects, including flashbacks and nightmares, which have led to anxiety about social activities.
Christopher Loxton, representing British Airways, remarked, “The defendant has little knowledge of the nature and extent of the claimant’s alleged injury, loss or damage,” indicating a dispute over the extent of Chesterton’s claims.
Chesterton has attended five physiotherapy sessions to address ongoing physical symptoms from the accident. The case is being pursued under the Montreal Convention, which governs airline liability for passenger injuries.
British Airways has admitted liability for the accident but contests the compensation amount related to psychological harm. Unless a settlement is reached outside of court, the case will proceed to a full assessment of damages.
Details remain unconfirmed regarding any potential settlement discussions between the parties involved. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for similar claims in the future.
